Africa

Featured JES Author: Rev. Dr. Gisela Uzukwu on "Crisis of Faith: Today's African Christians and Mami-Wata"

Issue 59.2 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available! For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes a full-text PDF version of their article available for 30 days on Project Muse. In this issue, we feature Gisela Uzukwu’s "CRISIS OF FAITH: TODAY’S AFRICAN CHRISTIANS AND MAMI-WATA.” A full-text PDF version of the article can be accessed HERE.


Dr. Gesila Nneka Uzukwu is a scholar of New Testament Studies in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Arts, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria. She holds a bachelor’s in Philosophy, bachelor’s in Theology, M.A and Licentiate in Theology and Religious Studies, and PhD in New Testament Studies (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium).

Her research interests are in New Testament Studies, Pauline literature, gender studies, and African Spiritualities and Theodicy. She is currently the Head of Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Nasarawa State University. She is the author of The Unity of Male and Female in Jesus Christ: An Exegetical Study of Galatians 3:28c in Light of Paul’s Theology of Promise. With her doctoral defence in New Testament Studies, she became the first African Woman to have obtained a Doctorate in Biblical Exegesis in Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. She has written several articles in both National and International journals. She is also a member of several editorial boards, such as, (a) Sapientia Logos: A Journal of Biblical Research & Interpretation in Africa; (b) THE CATHOLIC VOYAGE African Journal of Consecrated Life. A Publication of the Conference of Major Superiors of Nigeria; (c) Rubicon – NSUK Journal of Philosophy and Religion.

What is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

The J.E.S. article examines African Mami-wata spirituality in conversation with the present crisis of faith witnessed by many African Christians at the grassroots. The works of David Barrett, Philip Jenkins, and Andrew Walls have reiterated the intriguing shift in the center of Christianity to the Global South. In spite of all the creative theological enterprise that this paradigmatic shift has brought about, the issues of theodicy and Mami-wata spirituality have not been given the attention they rightly deserve. Yet, at the grassroots of African Christianities, Mami-wata spirituality in different forms has been used as an interpretative grid to explain the harsh existential problems confronting many African Christians. Unfortunately, systematic theologies in the Western traditions and their low-cost imitations in Africa have not engaged this crisis of faith at the grassroots of African Christianity, which is readily caused by the pragmatic appropriations of Mami-wata spirituality as a hermeneutical tool in order to interpret the existential problems of many African Christians. 

How, in your view, has the figure of Mami-Wata offered a solution to the problem of theodicy that Christianity has not?

The failure of African Christianity in its inability to solve the political and economic crisis of the African continent has further led many African Christians to seek help and solutions within the cultural precinct of traditional African spirituality. Historically, African Pentecostal Christianity has, for more than four decades now, mouthed the promises of wealth and prosperity to the African continent. Yet, most African Christians are living daily within the purview of enormous poverty and underdevelopment. Consequently, many African Christians are turning away from this Pentecostal message and seeking wealth and prosperity promised now by African Mami-wata advocates. Consequently, it seemed both African Pentecostal Christianity and Mami-wata religions were competitively at the long head in their quest to win over the soul of the African people.  Beyond this contestation, African Mami-wata spirituality appears to be winning in spite of the superficial victories of African Christianity in its populous character. For example, Mami-Wata spirituality deploys a realistic interpretative lens to the problem of good and evil. The theoretical and dogmatic nature of the Christian faith and its theology is not always at home with the African people since Africans are very practical in their representations of culture, traditions, and spiritualities. Guided by this understanding, some Africans would readily engage their African problems and solutions within their spiritual and traditional worldviews. Within this context, Mami-Wata spirituality has provided some Africans a fitting prism to engage their problems and find solutions. Similarly, the belief in witchcraft or spiritual manipulations is so prevalent and deeply embedded in the psyche of many Africans, (and Nigeria particularly) that it is almost impossible to explain the presence of evil without recourse to the mishap of spiritual beings.  Despite the many deliverance centers and prayer houses all across Africa, yet many African Christians underneath still romance with traditional African spiritualities. In Nigeria, this cultural romance embraces the inclusiveness of Mami-wata spirituality rather than the excessive dualism between good and evil as found in mainstream Africa Christianity.

How do Mami-Wata’s various positive and negative qualities provide a model of feminine divinity beyond the passive form of the Virgin Mary?

Mami-Wata spirituality fiercely engages African problems through the recognition of its active power, energetic presence, and aggressive personality. The fierceness of her anger is traditionally acknowledged particularly in combative defence of her devotees and to punish persons acts of sacrilege against her. In contrast, the traditional picture of the Virgin Mary embodies the opposite of this Mami-wata spirituality. The Virgin Mary is largely passive and operates only within the restrictive context of the Catholic faithful, while Mami-wata is directly connected to all human beings who use water. Interestingly, the usual praise of the Virgin Mary for her docility and submissive nature does not entirely resonate with the present African drive, spirit and energy which aggressively in tandem with Mami-wata personality advocate for the confrontation of all the dehumanized condition of their corporate existence instead of merely submitting to the status quo. In this regard, rather than the Virgin Mary model of submissiveness, the subversive personality of the Mami-Wata deity appears dynamically intriguing for many African Christians at the grassroots.

Why have Western and African Christianities alike struggled to engage seriously with the informal sites of religious expression such as those you surveyed in this study in this study?

African Christianity remained methodologically enslaved to the approach, areas of research interests, and concerns of Western Christianity. This paternalistic control and cultural hegemony of the West on African Christian theological discourses do not allow very often the engagement of contextual and local realities, which may be weird or strange to the Eurocentric interests of Western scholarship. Breaking this hegemony, research in Mami-wata repositioned past studies in theodicy, particularly in the discourse of systematic theology, to engage the contextual realities of the African people. Most importantly, the emerging field of World Christianity needs these local discourses in order to show the variegated character of Christianity, and the regional contours in expressions, struggles, and presentation of Global Christianity.  

How did you get interested in the topic?

I was brainstorming together with` Dr Matthew Michael, a colleague of mine at the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies here in Nigeria, when we suddenly realised that the standard discourses on theodicy in systematic theologies have not given recognition to the local discourses in theodicy which do not take the traditional path of talking about theodicy in direct relationship to God, but did not include the cultural significance of other supernatural beings in the discourses of theodicy. Dr. Michael encouraged me to pursue this important academic trajectory, and I am so glad I did because it clearly suggests the need to rewrite works on theodicy to include discourses on local deities or other contending spiritual entities. Consequently, this research interest already suggests that discourses on theodicy as done in the West should not be paternalistically imposed on other contexts such as Africa because the nature of discourses on theodicy is a little bit different here.

What is your next project?

As for my next project, I am working in collaboration with Dr. Michael on a book on “Mami-Wata spirituality and Theodicy.”  We hope that this work will bring to mainstream discourses on African Christianity and European systematic theologies the intriguing conversations on how local discourses on theodicy could enrich global Christian theology.

Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home

Featured JES Author: Effiong Joseph Udo on Dialogue and Democracy in Africa

The Summer Issue 58.3 of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies is now available. For each issue, the Diablogue features one author and makes available a full-text version of their article for 30 days on Project Muse. In this issue, we are featuring Effiong Joseph Udo's "A Reimagination of Dialogue and Democracy in Africa via an Afrocentric Reading of the Parable of the Sower (Lk. 8:4–8)." A full-text version of the article can be accessed HERE.

Effiong Joseph Udo, Ph.D., currently teaches New Testament Literature, Hermeneutics, and Dialogue at the Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. He is president of The Pan-African Dialogue Institute and director at the Centre for Deep Dialogue and Critical Thinking at the same University. His doctoral thesis on St Luke’s soteria (salvation) concept grounded his understanding of the ministry of Jesus as a spirit-filled campaign for prioritization of justice and human well-being in the society of his days. This inspired Dr. Udo’s research interests in biblical exegesis to promote social justice, human rights, peacebuilding, interfaith relations, as well as ecumenism.

He is an Ambassador for Peace of the Universal Peace Federation, New York, a member of Professors World Peace Academy, as well as a postdoctoral International dialogue fellow of King Abdullah Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID), Vienna, Austria.


In two sentences, what is the argument of your J.E.S. article?

In the article, I attempted to show how a pan-Africanist reading of the Second Testament Parable of the Sower in Lk. 8:4–8 informs a reimagination of dialogue and democracy in Africa. The study suggests that dialogue and democracy—which are ethically guided by the principles of equality, tolerance, cooperation, participation, and inclusion—are, in practice, complementary and mutually reinforcing, and these widely embraced values are present in African social systems, such as the ethics of communalism and ubuntu.

Many observers have characterized democracy as a Western import to African societies, but you have shown that many values and practices in traditional African societies are deeply democratic. What can democracies in Europe and North America learn from democratic African societies?

Guided by the lived ethics of ubuntu and communalism, Africans are socially and culturally oriented in values toward relationships, friendship, hospitality, cooperation, and tolerance of ‘the other’. I recommend that sustained efforts must be made by all stakeholders to deepen the knowledge and practice of these values in order to strengthen democratic engagements in Africa, Europe, North America, and other democratic societies in the world.

How did you get interested in the topic?

The African Union 2063 Agenda track on peace and democracy motivated my research. I sought to understand the presence, nature, and effects of civil society organizations’ engagements with African states and people to promote peace, human rights, and democratic ideals in the continent. I hoped that the effort would help in widening the Dialogue Institute’s contributions to deepening democratic ideals of freedom through its scholarship in dialogue and training in religious pluralism and democracy around the world. Working with Dr. David Krueger as a dialogue consultant for Africa with the Dialogue Institute, I also thought the Institute would be enriched by the exchange of experiences and perspectives of Africa’s traditional, academic, political, and religious leaders, youth, women, professional groups, and institutions because their dialogue and peacebuilding engagements are directed toward the African Renaissance.

In a few sentences, can you describe how the articles in this issue of the JES connect to the vision for The Pan-African Dialogue Institute?

It is remarkable that the project also gave birth to The Pan-African Dialogue Institute. In the course of my travels, I was able to bring together colleagues, civic leaders, and professionals in various disciplines, as well as youth and women’s groups from a number of African countries; and together we created The Pan-African Dialogue Institute. One could learn more by visiting: www.africadialogue.org. So far, members of the new institute include people from 18 African countries, and this number is still growing. Some individuals who had been on the DI African contacts, including the Study of the U.S. Institute on Religious Pluralism alumni, have also joined the Institute. Part of the rationale for creating the Institute was to serve the DI Board with a central body to relate with whenever Africa is on the agenda. 

I believe that the creation of The Pan-African Dialogue Institute represents a significant milestone for the DI under the leadership of Dr. Krueger as well as a lasting testimony of Prof. Leonard Swidler’s inspiration. It flows from Swidler’s mentorship and encouragement to Dr. Mutombo Nkulu-N’Sengha, founder of the DI-supported Bumuntu Peace Institute in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and my humble self of the University of Uyo in Nigeria to unite African scholars and professionals to embrace dialogue. This is why the Institute will remain in constant collaboration with the Dialogue Institute at Temple University. Created to foster multi-sectoral dialogue on issues in religion, culture, sciences, environment, law, economy, information, communications, technology, gender, and politics that promote democratic ideals and human rights in the Continent, and so on, the Institute is established as a civil society think tank. It seeks to unite African professionals and leaders to promote dialogue engagement that is rooted in Pan-Africanism and contribute to the building of policies and practices for the sustainable development of Africa. African professionals who are based in the continent and in the diaspora, from any field of life, as well as friends of Africa are welcome to join us; for dialogue is at its best in company, and not in isolation. 


Copy-of-Copy-of-The-Diablogue

Diablogue Home